The book of Revelation, in its letter to the church at Pergamom in Asia, speaks of a faithful martyr named Antipas (2:13).
No independent information about Antipas, who is remembered on April 11th in the calendar of the Eastern churches, is found in any of the earliest Christian sources.
Tertullian (c. 200) mentions him once as “the most faithful martyr who died where Satan dwells” (Scorp. 12), but he was drawing directly from the text in Revelation for his information.
Andreas of Cappadocia (c. AD 600) knew of an account of Antipas’ martyrdom that existed in his day, but it has not survived.
The famous story of Antipas being burned alive in a brazen bull is first found (in extant sources) in the Menalogion of the Byzantine hagiographer Symeon Metaphrastes, which was probably written in the tenth century.
The Menalogian contained various stories and fabulous legends about saints and martyrs, perhaps the most well-known of which is that of how Luke the physician painted an icon of Christ and of Mary.
The Menalogian‘s entry for Antipas reads as follows:
The contest of the holy hieromartyr Antipas, bishop of Pergamon.
Antipas, the adversary of demons, lived in the time of the holy apostles, when Domitian was king, and when faithful John was living on the island of Patmos. When he was bishop of Pergamon, being very old, he was seized by the idol worshippers, to whom the demons had appeared and said that they were not able to live in that place on account of Antipas.
For this reason, having been brought to the governor, he was ordered to deny Christ and sacrifice to the idols. But having not obeyed, and having (as an example) refuted the error of the Greeks, saying that the error was old but evil (for the governor had objected that the religious devotion of the Greeks was ancient, whereas that of the Christians was recent, and the saint answered that Cain was also ancient, who murdered his brother), he was thrown into a red hot bronze bull, and died.Translated by the author from PG 117:397.
Antipas and the Date of Revelation
According to the Menalogian, Antipas was martyred in Domitian’s reign (81-96). This story is consequently sometimes cited in popular works as evidence for the late date of Revelation. Thus, Hitchcock and Ice claim:
According to church history, Antipas was martyred during the reign of Domitian in either AD 83 or 92. Since the martyrdom of Antipas is in the past when Revelation was written, Revelation could not have been written before the reign of Domitian in AD 81.Mark Hitchcock and Thomas Ice, Breaking the Apocalypse Code: Setting the Record State About the End Times (Costa Mesa, CA: The Word for Today, 2007), 208.
However, Symeon combined various sources into single narratives, and it is impossible to say how much of the account, if any, reflects the tradition found in the martyrology referred to by Andreas.
As Moses Stuart observed:
In the Acta Sanctorum (II, pp. 3, 4) is a martyrology of Antipas from a Greek MS.; but it is full of fable and fiction, which a later age had added to the original story.”Moses Stuart, A Commentary on the Apocalypse (Edingburgh: MacClachlan, 1847), 475.
An Alternative Dating in Nero’s Reign
While the work of Metaphrastes is used in the Greek churches, the Russian Menea differs from it in relating that these things happened in the reign of Nero (r. 54-68). Unfortunately, I have not been able to ascertain the source of this claim.
Possibly the Russian Menea reflects knowledge of sources that drew from the martyrology with which Andreas was familiar, and which placed the martyrdom in Nero’s reign.
If so, this might have been “corrected” to Domitian’s reign by Metaphrastes on the basis of Eusebius’s dominant Domintianic dating of the exile, as such emendations are fairly common (cf. the editor who changed Tertullian’s text because it supported the Neronian dating of John’s exile).
Here is an excerpt from an English translation:
For the full English translation, see here.
Metaphrastes’s medieval account claimed that Antipas was martyred in Domitian’s reign (r. 81-96), but this is clearly insufficient evidence for positing that earlier sources did so. Metaphrastes or his source (or even a later editor who amended Metaphrastes’ text) likely placed the martyrdom within the context of the persecution during which they believed the book of Revelation to have been written, based upon the accounts in Eusebius’s Church History.
Extant early sources do not provide any independent information concerning Antipas, and while a martyrology was known to have existed in the time of Andreas (c. 600), it has long since perished. Thus, we are forced to conclude with Swete: “There is little to be gleaned about this primitive martyr from post-canonical writings.”
For further reading on the dating of John’s exile in early Christian sources, see: Patristic Evidence for the Early Dating of Revelation
For other articles discussing the date of Revelation, go to: https://deanfurlong.com/category/date-of-revelation/
 Henry B. Swete, The Apocalypse of St. John: The Greek Text with Introduction Notes and Indices (London: Macmillan, 1917), 35.
If you enjoyed this article, please like or share it.