I recently had cause to listen once again–the first time in years–to the debate between Hanegraaff and Hitchcock on the dating of Revelation. First off, it is clear that Hanegraaff was out of his depth when it came to the external evidence for the date of Revelation. One wonders what kind of edifying discussion it could have been had it been held with Kenneth Gentry instead, who could have presented a case for both the external and internal evidence for the early date (though I don’t accept his preterist interpretations).Continue reading “The Debate between Hanegraaff and Hitchcock”
The Muratorian Canon’s non-Domitianic exile tradition
The Muratorian Canon, which is usually dated to around 170 (before Irenaeus),* provides a list of canonical books that were accepted by the church at Rome at the time of writing.Continue reading “The Muratorian Canon on the Date of Revelation”
Sources do not support a Domitianic Dating
Four factors have contributed to the consensus opinion that early sources dated John’s apocalyptic vision late in Domitian’s reign:Continue reading “The Early Christians and the Dating of Revelation: Are We Too Late?”
Was the church of Smyrna founded too late for an early dating of Revelation?
Some claim that according to Polycarp, the Christians at Smyrna (one of the seven churches of Asia addressed in Revelation) had not known the Lord at the time of Paul’s ministry, which ended with his death (c. 66).Continue reading “Polycarp, Smyrna, and the Date of Revelation”
What do we know about the martyr Antipas, and does this affect our dating of Revelation?
Antipas , who is remembered on April 11th in the calendar of the Eastern churches, is spoken of as a faithful martyr in Revelation’s letter to the church at Pergamon in Asia (Rev 2:13).Continue reading “The Martyrdom of Antipas and the Dating of Revelation”