The ancient calendars of the church remember the martyrdom of the apostle John, the son of Zebedee, and his brother James on December 27.
In the calendars of the ancient church, John the son of Zebedee was remembered on the 27th December (or sometimes the 28th).
One of the earliest such calendars is an Armenian one, perhaps dating from the third century, which remembers “James and John, the Sons of Thunder” on the 28th December.
Continue reading “The Martyrdom of John the Son of Zebedee”
It’s commonly thought that John the son of Zebedee was the author of the Gospel of John, the figure spoken of in that Gospel as “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” The two are never explicitly identified, however, and there are reasons for questioning this identification.
Here are eight points to consider:
Continue reading “Were John son of Zebedee and the Beloved Disciple the same person?”
Examining the argument that Papias was identifying the Elder John with the Apostle
Part 4: The Argument for a Single John
Some scholars argue that Papias spoke of the same John twice, thus removing any possibility that a second John, the Elder, was associated with the Johannine writings.
Continue reading “Papias: One John or Two? (Part 4)”
Even many prominent scholars of the traditional view reject the view that Papias spoke of one John
Part 3: Concessions from Scholars Holding the Traditional View
In this post, we will see that Papias’s differentiation of the two Johns has been accepted even among those who hold the traditional view (that the Apostle John, the son of Zebedee, wrote all of the Johannine works), despite the fact that this creates an otherwise unknown John who was famous at the time of Papias. Papias’s words are:
Continue reading “Papias: One John or Two? (Part 3)”
My research into the thesis that the early Christians identified John/Mark with John the Evangelist
Continue reading “John Mark? You have got to be kidding me!”
I remember as a graduate student talking about my undergraduate research with another student. There was interest until I mentioned that I had examined the potential identification of the Beloved Disciple/John the Evangelist with the John also called Mark.
Immediately the mood changed. Words didn’t need to be spoken; the incredulous look and change in demeanor said it all. The conversation was brought to an abrupt end.